Using this information, it becomes interesting to view the surfaces in aggregate from the top down. While we might presume the impressions and accompanying work to be symmetrical, in reality the constructs are highly irregular and often preference a single side. In this drawing, we see that the right side of the impression has become more generalized as it attempts to adapt to the changing conditions of the sweeping leg. Just as well, you might notice that as the surface bends backwards, the waist becomes increasingly information-dense and fraught with near-unintelligible angles. The final animation in this set is a collection of the top-down images from the two previous analyses. Within these two constructs, it is readily apparent the amount of work being performed at the waist through the densification of lines. Also notable is the directionality of lines within the upper half of the torso, which reveal the vectorized nature and momentum of the final posture in space.
Again, by comparing the top-down views of either iteration, we are able to obtain a clearer understanding of the key components in this motion. Regardless of which direction the construct is twisting, the densification of lines at the waist reveal the importance of the stationary axis in articulating form. This quality is heightened through the fleeting outer edges produced as the surface twists to the right. Juxtapose this with the consistent re-layering of the left field, and the dissymmetry becomes the most outstanding quality of the event.
Finally, through the viewing of both top-down animations together, we may better understand the permanence of the interior edge against the ever-shifting nature of the space generated between the torso and the arm. The density and repetition of lines on the exterior of the construct provide a necessary boundary against which the form is able to adapt and change while still remaining legible.
For my closing remarks - I would like to say that I hope this work is able to spark a dialogue regarding the consequence of human form within the built environment, or more generally any condition catered to the human disposition. What we know as the occupant is an enigmatic and often over-generalized character, the nuance of which is vast and ever-changing. Moving forward, it is my wish that through technological advancement, we as architects might be able to design and adapt to this less rigid model of occupation, as well as discover new ways of defining what it means to inhabit space.